ZetaTalk: Science Read online

  accumulate the substance of which souls are composed, when this has not formed into an entity, and remains loose and

  undefined. This is packaged into the whole, and spread uniformly during the big bang, and thus the process of worlds

  forming and evolving begins again, in a small part of the Universe. This is part of God's plan, as far as we know it.

  All rights reserved: [email protected]

  http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s17.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:38 AM]

  ZetaTalk: Turnabout

  Mail this Pageto a Friend.

  ZetaTalk: Turnabout

  Note: written during the 2001 sci.astro debates.

  Does the expansion coming out of a Big Bang continue forever, or does it turnabout and become a large Black Hole,

  to start the process again? A discussion on these issues places man outside of his environment, as to him he sees only

  expansion in the Universe around him, so a turnabout is theoretical and thus subject to haggling. We, the Zetas, have

  visited portions of the Universe where a turnabout is in process, so can speak to these issues with confidence.

  However, on these sci.astro debates, haggling occurs in any case. To make the statement that expansion goes on into

  infinity is to assume that such activity occurs in a vacuum - a silly assumption. You have expansion and contraction

  occurring in a school yard, when a toy rocket is sent skyward and then slows and falls back to earth. Should one of the

  boys declare that the rocket will proceed forever, based on dissecting the trajectory so only the escape is considered,

  he’d be called a fool. But on sci.astro, this is allowed to be a serious argument.

  So what are the factors that influence a turnabout?

  First, the rush of matter leaving a Big Bang is not homogeneous, else formation of stars and planets would not occur

  but the Universe would be like Jell-O or pudding, all one consistency. Subatomic particles retain their identify even

  within a Black Hole, and waste no time returning to their familiar dance of interaction with other particles, based on

  their nature, when freed from the constraints of the Black Hole. Thus, during the rush of matter leaving an exploding

  Black Hole, there are parts to the side as well as before and behind any given matter or clump of matter, and this is the incipient basis of the turnabout. An endless stretch into infinity, that silly argument, assumes only the influence behind any given escaping matter, which is simply never the case.

  Second, incipient Black Holes are formed immediately after a Big Bang, and why would they not? Black Holes are

  driven by gravity, a gravitational giant that assumed a density so intense that the flow of gravity particles attracted to it

  overwhelms the outbursts of particles squeezing out from the center, tipping the equilibrium such that an ever-

  increasing density of the gravitational giant occurs. Gradually, it builds in strength and size, and pulls from the side

  that matter moving outward from the Big Bang. So the motion changes from expansion to a slowing curve, and

  eventually to a compression of matter into the nearest Black Hole, and thence of Black Holes into each other, until the

  stage is set for another Big Bang.

  All rights reserved: [email protected]

  http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s105.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:39 AM]

  ZetaTalk: Dark Matter

  Mail this Pageto a Friend.

  ZetaTalk: Dark Matter

  Note: written by Jul 15, 1995.

  Dark matter has been postulated by scientists to explain all the movement and behavior that they cannot explain in the

  Universe. Insert dark matter, and it all fits, or so they are currently postulating. In fact, dark matter does not explain it all, or even explain it very well, but this is the current fad. Why is dark matter termed dark? Well, because folks can't

  see it, or measure it, or capture it, and thus it is dark, hiding, as it were. Well, matter does not hide. It has no reason to do so, being without a sneaky motive. It is not dark matter that is gluing everything together in some strange,

  immeasurable way, it is tiny matter, in fact, which the scientists of Earth have yet to see because it is too little for their

  eyes and their instruments as of yet.

  The particles of tiny matter, like bugs, are more numerous as they get smaller. Humans are always horrified to see how

  many mites there are in a speck of dust. Mites are everywhere, and should one have the guts to count, the number of

  mites in the room would be vastly greater than the number of silverfish or cockroaches. And, of course, the number of

  bugs in the room vastly outweighs the number of humans. Such is the situation in the Universe. Man saw the planets,

  e.g. humans in the room, and registered their personalities. This happened early on. Then man become aware of the

  energy that composes the solar wind, and light rays that come from distant galaxies, e.g. visible bugs in the room, and

  registered their personalities. This happened recently. However, humans are not yet aware of the galactic tiny stuff,

  e.g. mites, and thus don't have a very important piece of the puzzle in place.

  Before humans became aware of the planets, and their relationship to the Sun, there were all kinds of strange

  explanations for their motions. Since the Flat Earth Society is still among you, we need not go into detail. Before

  humans became aware of the energy paths in the galaxy, there also were all kind of strange explanations for what

  seemed to be the erratic nature of the greater Universe, which bobbled and glowed and winked, behavior which was

  most often ascribed to the gods or one's own misbehavior. Now scientists are dealing with the larger, visible planets

  behaving toward one another like something else is there. You can assume this to be a massive amount of tiny matter.

  The stuff the Universe is made of, elemental particles that are not moving, are not clumping, and thus do not form

  mass or register as energy.

  Nothing to get excited about. Just calculate its weight, and think of it as galactic air - something to pass through.

  All rights reserved: [email protected]

  http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s14.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:39 AM]

  ZetaTalk: Space/Time Curves

  Mail this Pageto a Friend.

  ZetaTalk: Space/Time Curves

  Note: written on Feb 15, 1997.

  Regarding the amusing human notion that space/time curves. This theory gained credence recently as humans have

  been able to track cosmological events more closely with the Hubble, and noted that the perimeter of an explosion

  curved slightly as the event progressed. Do you imagine that light rays are immune to gravitational influences? They

  are formed of particles, just as what you call matter is, and as such as subject to the same influences. We have stated

  that the Auroras, which are visible light shows and not at all related to magnetic fields, are caused by the bending of

  light subjected to the Earth's gravity. This would be visible elsewhere around the globe, but except in the dim light

  near the poles does not stand out. Why would particles move in a curve?

  Humans should keep in mind that what they see of the Universe reflects

  the original situation, such as a nova, that caused the light to escape and move in the direction of Earth.

  the direction those light particles were pulled in, by gravitational influences

  What humans on Earth do not see is

  light that was not moving in a straight line path toward Earth, to begin with

  light that was pulled so that it was no longer in a straight-line path toward Earth

  Your human scientists are aware of this, identifying places in spac
e where no light seems to escape as black holes.

  Nevertheless, as curving space/time seemed like such an interesting possibility among those hoping to always prolong

  their stay at the trough the taxpayers are obliged to fill, NASA talked it up. They know better but don't want the

  paychecks to stop.

  All rights reserved: [email protected]

  http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s89.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:40 AM]

  ZetaTalk: Gravity

  Mail this Pageto a Friend.

  ZetaTalk: Gravity

  Note: written on Feb 15, 1996.

  Humans think that gravity is a simple, singular force, but gravity has many aspects and varies depending on the

  composition of the objects in question and their distance from each other.

  Gravity differs between objects of different compositions. Like compositions attract each other more, due to the

  compatibility of their makeup. They have no extraneous dramas to resolve. Metals figure heavily in this, no pun

  intended, as a magnetic component enters into the equation. Where there is flexibility for the objects to turn, one or

  both will maneuver such that they are magnetically aligned. This takes time, however slight, and thus an iron ball may

  appear to fall more slowly in a vacuum than an object of comparable weight that has but a slight magnetic retention.

  Organic compounds also react to gravity in a different manner than in-organic compounds, and this is due to the

  complex bonding between the atoms. Bonding involves tying up the electrons, which are used as glue in that they are

  shared by more than one atom. Thus, organic material in general will not experience the interference that matter with

  free electrons does during a gravity attraction. Inorganic material in essence takes time out to shed or take on electrons,

  slowing its movement.

  In general, the heavier an object, the greater the gravity force generated within it for another object. The gravity force

  is more than compounded, equivocally, but this fact is lost by those viewing the drama because most of the drama takes

  place within the object itself. Why would this not be the case? Why would matter only reach out to matter not

  contiguous, with its attraction, and not matter near at hand? Some call this internal gravity compression, but this is

  merely gravity working to pull each atom toward the greater bulk, which in the case of an orb, like a Sun or planet, is

  generally toward the center. As the force of gravity reaches in all directions, the larger or heavier object is emitting

  more of a come-on than a smaller or lighter object. When several objects are involved in giving each other the come-

  on, the contention causes all of the bodies to dither, but an equilibrium is established in accordance with the mass and

  composition of the objects and their distance from each other. Humans find their understanding of gravity to be

  incomplete because they are not taking into consideration the repulsion force that large bodies, such as planets,

  generate toward each other.

  All rights reserved: [email protected]

  http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s55.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:40 AM]

  ZetaTalk: Anti-Gravity Devices

  Mail this Pageto a Friend.

  ZetaTalk: Anti-Gravity Devices

  Note: written on Aug 15, 1996.

  The advent of the space age and the increasing number of UFO sightings have generated intense curiosity about space

  travel in human scientists. Some cling to the notion that all travel within or against a gravity field must be by

  propulsion, clinging to known and familiar theories - airplanes lifting off the ground and running parallel as long as the

  air stream over the wings can be maintained, or rockets sent out and away from the Earth's gravity by propulsion.

  Space ships, which zip about and hover as though gravity did not exist are clearly not run by propulsion, however, and

  thus speculation is running rampant. Mankind will not be given the answers he seeks, nor will he be able to arrive at

  the correct solution based on his own efforts. Human scientists are working and reworking their current concepts,

  which are fraught with errors, and thus, heading in the wrong directions, they will not succeed.

  Various theories on how space ships maneuver have been put forth, but none have been on target.

  The silliest theories are that space ships indeed use propulsion, but are subtle about it. These theories have the

  space ships hovering by the same means that hover craft stay above the ground or water, by blowing air out from

  the bottom of the craft. All this is accomplished, so the theory goes, without disturbing the air space, though this

  obvious contradiction is never addressed. Sightings where space ships move silently through forests, with never

  a branch or leaf moving as they pass, would seem to discredit this theory, but the advocates hold firm. This

  theory is a favorite of some as it allows mankind to be on a technological par with the visitors.

  A partially correct theory is that space ships generate their own gravity field. This is not so much a theory as an

  observation, since ships not only hover as though treating the gravity pull of the Earth with disdain, but provide

  the occupants with their own gravity field. Earth scientists in the employ of MJ12 have first hand knowledge of

  this, having taken short jaunts in observation ships and having noted that the ground can be in view overhead,

  yet their feet remain stuck firmly to the floor. Creating one's own gravity field is primarily for comfort, not

  travel, but it is also a component required for travel.

  Element 115, a heavy metal Bob Lazar was introduced to, is indeed one of the means to achieve space travel,

  though not the only means. Element 115 does not in and of itself have magical properties, a fact which should be

  obvious from the reports leaking out of MJ12 labs. If element 115 had special gravity features, generating its

  own gravity field without abatement, then all the scientists would find their feet stuck to the container rather than

  the lab floor. It is not element 115 per se but the structure of its composition that supports other steps in the

  process, and about this we will say no more.

  Short cuts, such as space warps, have been discussed for decades as the easy answer. The Universe is circular, so

  the theory goes, and all one need do to go elsewhere is step back along the circle rather than go the whole way

  around. This theory is absurd, and doesn't take much to dispute. How does the Universe manage to project itself

  to its astronomers and the stargazers among its common folk as linear if its actually up there in curves? Is the

  Universe conducting a massive conspiracy to delude mankind? Star systems that appear to be far away are in

  fact at a distance, and there are no short cuts, distance wise.

  Negating the Earth's atmosphere is one step in the process, and as we have mentioned is one of the reasons for

  generating an internal gravity in a space ship during travel. This is done, however, not to lift off the Earth, but to

  provide the environment for the next step. Space ships hovering above the Earth are still dealing with the Earth's

  gravity field, in full.

  Hovering involves invoking the repulsion force in a controlled manner, and space travel involves turning it off in

  a controlled manner. Space travel is a irresistible kiss, and a quick kiss, between two gravity attractors. This

  http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s77.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:41 AM]

  ZetaTalk: Anti-Gravity Devices

  quick kiss is achieved by turning off the repulsion force between two poi
nts, and is a carefully controlled

  process. As mankind has yet to even accept the existence of a repulsion force, they will hardly arrive at the

  scheme in the near future. And then, mankind is hampered by all the errors in their existing theories, which are

  dragged forward as some sort of garbage that can never be discarded, held close to the hearts and minds of their

  advocates.

  All rights reserved: [email protected]

  http://www.zetatalk2.com/science/s77.htm[2/5/2012 11:53:41 AM]

  ZetaTalk: Repulsion Force

  Mail this Pageto a Friend.

  ZetaTalk: Repulsion Force

  Note: written on Sep 15, 1995.

  Scientists are acutely aware of the attraction force inherent in gravity, as are folks in general. The babe learns about

  this early, while taking his first few steps. Oops. Ouch! It is assumed that gravity has only an attractive force, and that

  the planets, in orbit around the Sun, are held in place by their momentum. Does this make sense? What caused the

  momentum in the first place? Children play with a ball on the end of a string, swinging it around and around their

  head. As long as the arm is tugging, the ball maintains its orbit, else stops. Why would the planets not drift into the

  Sun? Are the orbits all that swift so that centrifugal force is extreme?

  The reason Mankind is Unaware of a repulsive force, also inherent in gravity, is that for this to become evident there must be a semblance of equality in size and weight, i.e. the mass of the objects, and freedom of movement such as

  exists in space, and lack of undue influence from other nearby objects. Objects on the surface of the Earth have none

  of these. They are infinitesimal in proportion to the Earth itself, and thus any repulsion the Earth may have toward a

  tiny speck on its surface is also infinitesimal. Proportionally, its all gravity, a one way trip. The object on the surface,

  pushing away, is overwhelmed by the Earth's gravitational pull, the attraction. The repulsion force is generated as a

  result of two bodies exerting a gravitational force on each other. In the case of a tiny object on the surface of the Earth,